And it is the approved one whose half-life this site will not state
Here is the awkward part, and this site prints it rather than smoothing it over. The molecule with the approved product is the one whose half-life this site cannot state. Sermorelin’s figure carries a document. Tesamorelin’s renders a [needs citation] marker wherever it appears, including on the axis below.
It is not a gap in the looking. Three FDA labels for tesamorelin give three different half-lives and the only thing separating them is the face date printed on each one, so citing any single label would attach a real document to a figure the other two contradict. The recorded value is also not a range: it is two population point estimates — one in healthy subjects, one in patients — printed as though somebody had measured a span. On a site whose organising rule is that ranges stay ranges, publishing that under a citation would be the exact failure it exists to name.
So the marker stays until the record can hold what the documents actually say. It is one of 3 claims across the 5 molecules still in that state, all of them listed and explained on the sources page, and it is part of why this site does not claim its own axis is fully sourced.